Mission Resources Reference Center News Room Contact Us About Us Photos Mission Reference Publications Multimedia Catalog Calendar Newsletter Jewish Spirituality  Speakers Services Forum

Response - Reference Center -
FAQ - Proof Texts-Crucifixion


 
GENERAL QUESTIONS
Cults & Missionaries
Missionary Groups
Missionary Tactics
How to Respond
Christianity & History
The Messiah
 
PROOF TEXTS
Resurrection
Birth of Jesus
Suffering Servant
Jeremiah
Daniel
Atonement
Trinity
Second Coming
Original Sin
Crucifixion
Jesus
Disciples
Passover Seder
N.T. Anti-Judaism
Apostates
 
 

 

 

 

Response Question: What difference does it make if Jesus did or did not undergo serious blood loss while being prepared for or undergoing execution?

 



Answer: According to the New Testament, blood must be shed in order to obtain atonement. The author of the Book of Hebrews maintains that obtaining forgiveness of sin always necessitates that there must first be a shedding of blood (Hebrews 9:11-12, 22). Luke's Jesus claims that his blood was shed for his followers (Luke 22:20).

In the biblical blood sacrifice offering, a token blood letting is not sufficient nor is mere death sufficient. The sacrifice has to die through the shedding of blood. At no time did Jesus suffer blood loss to the extent of it being the cause of his death. Neither the blood loss due to the scourging (Matthew 27:26, Mark 15:15, John 19:1), the nail wounds (John 20:25), or crown of thorns (Matthew 27:29, Mark 15:17, John 19:2) caused Jesus' death. As a result, not only was Jesus' death not an everlasting atonement for sin it was not even a sacrifice.

Content Copyright Gerald Sigal, 1999-2003
 

 

 
All material on this site is copyright ©2003 by Jews for Judaism® except where noted otherwise. All rights reserved. Requests for permission to reprint for other than personal use should be directed to info@jewsforjudaism.org or to P.O. Box 15059, Baltimore, MD. 21282