Mission Resources Reference Center News Room Contact Us About Us Photos Mission Reference Publications Multimedia Catalog Calendar Newsletter Jewish Spirituality  Speakers Services Forum

Response - Reference Center -
FAQ - Proof Texts-Birth of Jesus


 
GENERAL QUESTIONS
Cults & Missionaries
Missionary Groups
Missionary Tactics
How to Respond
Christianity & History
The Messiah
 
PROOF TEXTS
Resurrection
Birth of Jesus
Suffering Servant
Jeremiah
Daniel
Atonement
Trinity
Second Coming
Original Sin
Crucifixion
Jesus
Disciples
Passover Seder
N.T. Anti-Judaism
Apostates
 
 

 

 

 

Response Question: Is Jesus the son that is referred to in Proverbs 30:4?

 



Answer: In an attempt to prove the divine origin of Jesus, Christian theologians have pointed to this proverb as a prooftext for their claim. However, an examination of what the text actually says will dispel any attempt at such a forced interpretation.

After informing us that he does not have all the wisdom and understanding that he should possess, Agur, the son of Jakeh, poses a series of rhetorical questions, the answers to which he realizes all men who seek knowledge should possess:

Who has ascended up into heaven, and descended? Who has gathered the wind in his fists? Who has bound the waters in his garment? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and what is his son's name, if you know? (Proverbs 30:4)

Knowing the answers to these questions is to know the fundamentals of all knowledge.

The answer to the question "What is his name?" is given in the Scriptures, where we are informed that only God, the creator of heaven and earth, is in complete control of the forces of nature. Following this question a second question is asked: "What is his son's name?" As the first question is readily answered through a reading of the Scriptures, the source of all true knowledge, so, too, the second question is to be answered by studying the same source. We thus obtain the answer by studying such verses as Exodus 4:22: "Israel is My son, my firstborn"; Deuteronomy 14:1: "You are the children of the Lord your God"; and Hosea 2:1: "It will be said to them: 'You are the children of the living God.'" Consequently, it is Israel that is the name of His son, His firstborn. True, we find elsewhere in the Bible that David and Solomon stand in a filial relationship with God (Psalms 89:27-28, 1 Chronicles 22:10, 28:6). Indeed, this will also be true of the future Messiah. But the right to this title is due, in the final analysis, to the fact that they are the representatives or personifications of Israel as a whole. Hence, it is Israel that is the sole bearer of the august title of the "son" or "firstborn" of God.

Christian theology may argue that any reference to Israel's relationship with God only points to an allegedly greater relationship between God and Jesus, but this argument remains unproved, having no bases in the Jewish Scriptures. It is an argument based on misguided motives, trying to prove the preconceived by forced interpretation. Only in a figurative sense will the future Messiah, when the calms, enter into the "sonship" of God, a position he will share with all of God's chosen servants.

Content Copyright Gerald Sigal, 1999-2003
 

 

 
All material on this site is copyright ©2003 by Jews for Judaism® except where noted otherwise. All rights reserved. Requests for permission to reprint for other than personal use should be directed to info@jewsforjudaism.org or to P.O. Box 15059, Baltimore, MD. 21282