| |
Answer: Jesus' claim to be the Messiah was the accusation
placed against him before the Sanhedrin and Pilate.
To the charge of his messianic claim, Jesus answered
both the Jewish authorities and Pilate in a forceful
manner (John 18:19-23, 33-37).
The statement: "Therefore Pilate entered the judgment
hall again and called Jesus, and said to him: 'Are you
the King of the Jews?'" makes it clear that claiming
to be the King Messiah was the Jewish accusation against
Jesus. Matthew and Mark comment that Jesus did not answer
the Jewish accusations when questioned by Pilate: "But
he did not answer him, not even to a single charge"
(Matthew 27:14); "But Jesus made no further answer"
(Mark 15:15).
However, the list of charges made by the Jews, which
is found in Luke's Gospel: "misleading our nation and
forbidding to pay taxes to Caesar, and saying that he
himself is Christ, a King" (Luke 23:2), is answered
by Jesus. The charges are answered in his defense before
Pilate, as found in John's Gospel. There he claimed
to head a peace-loving, nonmilitary, otherworldly group,
which would not countenance revolt against the Roman
Empire. John argues, with the help of alleged quotations
from the trial, that Jesus claimed to be King of the
Jews but not one who sought power in this world, i.e.,
at the expense of the Roman Empire (John 18:36).
Far from showing the humility and silence with which
Isaiah describes the servant in verse 7, the encounter
between the high priest, the elders, and Jesus is highlighted
by a vigorous verbal exchange. In addition, Jesus did
not show humility and silence during his confrontation
with Pilate. At their meeting, Jesus is depicted as
skillfully defending himself. Jesus at no time humbled
himself, but, on the contrary, presented a clever verbal
defense before Pilate (the one man who could condemn
him to death), pleading shrewdly that his messianic
teaching was a nonviolent, "not of this world" movement,
one which the Romans need not fear. Pilate, Jesus assumed,
would not be interested in a non-political, non-military
movement that was not of "this world." However, Jesus'
movement must have appeared to Pilate like any of the
other seditious movements that confronted him. He reacted
accordingly.
Jesus was obviously defending himself by presenting
a shrewd verbal response when he tried to convince Pilate
that he was not the head of a seditious movement but
that his intentions were peaceful.
Contrary to what Christian theologians claim, the
Gospels' Jesus presented a strong defense before the
Jewish officials and Pilate. Jesus was not "dumb" but
very outspoken before his accusers, Jewish or Gentile.
Therefore, it is simply not true to say of Jesus that
"he humbled himself and did not open his mouth." |